Credit

Credit is an issue that concerns everyone connected to academia from students to professors.  We have names for situations where due credit is not given: plagiarism.  The act of plagiarism can be committed by students, professors, and academic researchers.  While it is a serious offence, it is extremely common, in part due to there being a fuzzy boundary between what is plagiarism and what is not.

Why am I discussing this issue on a blog about mental health and academia?  I am writing about this, because I see my students struggle with it, and I myself struggle with it.  Indeed my struggles over this issue go so deep that they have been the subject of deep worries.  The reason behind these worries is that it is not sufficient to do good work, rather that work must be credited to the one doing the work.

Careers are made by proper credit and destroyed by improper credit.  Credit is the currency of academia, the currency of success, and some people advance their careers by taking credit for the work done by others.  There are professors who believe, correctly or incorrectly, that they are responsible for the work done by their subordinates.  There are labs where the culture is such that the supervisor takes credit for all the work published by people in that laboratory.  Some people do not believe that those actions are plagiarism.  I disagree.  I feel that such a policy is tantamount to the lower power individuals buying the support of the more senior people by essentially ghost writing papers for them.  I think these sorts of policies have no place in academia, because it is essentially plagiarism.

Coming back the students, I have heard my students express concern over the credit on their group projects.  Invariably, it is the students who are succeeding in class that find themselves in a group with weaker contributors and that find themselves carrying their weaker classmates along.  Not only can the extra burden of work be onerous, but also the assignment of credit in the form of a project grade can seem unfair.  Is it not plagiarism if the weaker student takes equal credit for the project?

So, how should we deal with these issues?  In the case of researchers, we need more strict rules defining what is plagiarism in research and more frequent use of ethical sanctions on individuals who violate the ethical rules.  Individuals in low power situations, such as graduate students and post-doctoral fellows, should have ways of speaking up about mis-credited work without fearing for their jobs or degrees.

As for students, they, too, should have ways of speaking up.  For example as part of grading projects, the professor can ask for the students' input on how much each person of the group contributed, including themselves.  While most of the responses will have an inflated self-assessment, the average over the responses of several group members should be more reliable.  (Because of the inflation, there is some difficulty when considering groups of one or two people.) However, grading mechanisms such as this can help give credit where credit is due.

Because of the amount of extreme worry that can result from mis-attributed credit.  I call on all of us to try our hardest to be fair.  We shouldn't just be more than fair to ourselves.  In the wording of Orson Welles our current situation is the following:

All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.

Let us try to be at least as fair to our subordinate and our students, as we are to ourselves.  Let us have strict definitions of what a research contribution is.  Let us not accept having our name on a paper that we did not contribute to.  Let us be open about who contributed what to each paper, and let us give credit where it is due.   Let us not have our judgement about credit be clouded by (potential) acclaim.  And, let us remember that some of us, perhaps those with the greatest ability to contribute to scientific progress, are even more sensitive to unfairness and mis-attribution of credit than other people are.  While many people brush these issues off and play the credit game as it is, there are others, like myself, who are greatly pained by the status quo.